Donate to NNNNM!

Translate

Welcome to Na Nach!

FREEDOM - LIBERTY - EMANCIPATION

Tuesday, December 29, 2020

The Great Reset of Na Nach Nachma Nachman MAyUMaN

 

HH

The Talmud in Taanis (25a) relates that Rabbi Elazar Ben Padas was extremely poor and he passed out and HY came to him, and he asked HY how long he would have to bear the pain in this world, and HY replied, “Elazar my son, is it ok with you that I overturn the world from its onset, perhaps you will be born in a time of sustenance?” Rabbi Elazar Ben Padas replied, “to such an extant, and even still it is only a possibility? Have I lived most of my life etc.? HY replied, “yes.” Rabbi Elazar Ben Padas said, “If that’s the case, it is not necessary.” HY replied, in reward for saying it isn’t necessary I am giving you etc., see there at length.

The commentaries question the exact meaning of overturning the world, some say it just means his own life, and he would come back in a different gilgul – reincarnation, see there.

There is a story in the book Shivchay HuAri (The Praises of the Arizal, pg 6), that the Arizal once saw a plague of locust descending on the city of Tsfas that would consume all the produce of the city, and he commanded to quickly give money and appease a certain kosher Jew, Rabbi Alteraz, who was crying to HY over his poverty, and wasn’t able to hold back from about his neighbours who knew of his plight and had no pity on him.

The simple understanding of this story is that poor man simply brought wrath upon the city, and he too would go down with the rest of them.

However, it is possible that this plague of locust is the aspect of overturning the world which HY considered doing on the chance that it would alleviate the poverty of Rabbi Elazar, in fact, Alteraz, is an anagram for Elazar – with an extra T. Rabbi Elazar Ben Padas told HY that it was not necessary  – and for this he was rewarded tremendously, which would definitely insinuate that someone of slightly lesser stature, or even of the same stature – who still had most of his life ahead of him - would not be able to forgo the chance of being saved from their misfortune, and perhaps that is what happened in this case of Rabbi Alteraz, and the great havoc of the plague was an opportunity and possibility for Rabbi Alteraz to gain a better fortune.

Who knows how many times such things happened in history, and perhaps the great reset we are seeing in the world right now is on account of some impoverished Jew who’s plight was overlooked by his people.

May HY have mercy in merit of the holy Petek of Na Nach Nachma Nachman MayUman! May the great reset be entirely merciful with the new song and new world order of Na Nach Nachma Nachman MAyUMaN!


#nanach #nanachnachmanachmanmayuman #breslov #plague #pestilence #locust #arizal #poverty #reset #gilgul #reincarnation #pity #charity #safed  #tsfas #rabbielazarbenpadas #elazar #story #taanis #taanis25



4 comments:

The villager said...

I think the Shah thought he was on a higher level than Cyrus and even God Himself. King of Kings. I ran ! Look no further

MC said...

A point you did not make explicitly but i think you were touching on

Would Hashem punish a whole group because of a victim - and even punich the victom himself among them?

Anshei Sedom were ro'im vachato'im - including bein odom leechaveiroi

ie min ha-stam there were victims in Sedom. (Dor HaMabul, etc) So Hashem will get angry and to punish / avenge this harm he will destroy EVERYONE. What does that achieve? Imagine a father sees one son bully another. so he kicks them both?

Of course we could make dichuyim in the metzi'us

Maybe all the victims were not in Sedom anymore. Maybe the Dor Hambul kiled all their victims before the Mabul.
Maybe even the victims themselves victimsed others, in a giant circle of "chomos". Maybe the victims WANTED to be abusers themselves, were pleased by it, and spoke up in support of it. (Like the bechoir of the shevi in Mitzraim)
Maybe even the victims sinned bein odom laMokom so got swallowed up in the general punishment.

But maybe the punishment is more of an inbuilt consequence to the whole tzibbur if there is a certai level of achzoriyus - the whole tzibbur has cut themsleves off from chiyus - even the "victims" are cut off too, as long as they're part of this tzibbur.

I know this wasn't your main point but i think you touched on it

Much love

MC

NaNach Noahide said...

How about Sodom and Gomorrah? 馃

NaaNaach said...

HH there seems to be different levels. The story with the Arizal, the man was obviously righteous, but also not even aware of the calamity he was bringing. Whereas with Rabbi Elazar ben Padas, HY actually presented him with choice....
Na NaCh NaChMa NaChMaN MayUMaN